Forget the media-hyped back and forth between President Donald Trump and London Mayor Sadiq Khan that has Trump rightfully condemning Khan for Khan’s “no big deal” approach to dealing with the repeated terrorist attacks in London. What continues to go largely unreported are Khan’s long-standing ties to Islamic extremists, including his defense of a 9/11 terrorist.
What is going on here? How is it a supporter of radical Islam becomes mayor of London and is being fast-tracked to be a future Prime Minister of Great Britain? And why is the Mainstream Media so clearly determined to cover up Khan’s shocking extremist past?
Consider that today Mayor Khan is asking to ban President Trump from visiting London due to Khan’s view that Trump is “too extreme” and does not represent what “London stands for.”
And yet, Khan was not too long ago demanding American Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who has described Jews as ‘blood-suckers’ called Hitler ‘a very great man’ and advocated violence against non-Muslims, be allowed to visit London. (Great Britain has long banned Farrakhan from entering the country.)
In 2004 Khan defended the radical Muslim scholar Yusuf Al-Qaradawi who Khan argued was being unfairly portrayed as an extremist by political conservatives in England. And yet, Al-Qaradawi authored the book The Lawful and Prohibited in Islam which advocates for the subjugation of women and condones suicide bombings against Israel which he considers to be ‘God’s justice’. That is the real Al-Qaradawi, the man Mayor Khan says is NOT an extremist. (But Donald Trump is in Mr. Khan’s eyes.)
In 2006 Khan signed a letter that lay blame for the terror attacks in Great Britain on the policies of Great Britain, saying those policies (namely support of Israel) were motivating Muslims to attack them. During the mayoral race that saw Khan elected, when this subject was briefly brought up it was condemned by the British Press as an act of Islamophobia. Khan was given a pass, the British people were kept ignorant of his statements, and he won the election.
In 2009 Khan said on Iranian television that liberal Muslims were “Uncle Toms.” Again, the British Press covered for him and attacked any political opponent who tried to use Khan’s own words against him. It was during this time that Khan began to express publicly how he supported gay marriage. He used this to great effect to alleviate concerns about his Islamist past. And yet, even as Mayor Khan was saying this, his treatment of his own wife AFTER the election makes clear his demand that she subscribe fully to his more “traditional” Muslim views on women which places them as second-class citizens fully subservient to the authority of men:
All of the above are true – including Khan’s defense of 9/11 terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui.
Please ask yourself how it is that an anti-Semite who is now telling Londoners that Islamist terror attacks should be accepted as a “way of life” for them and wants to ban an American president for being too extreme but welcomes a racist radical Muslim who calls for the killing of Jews and Whites into London with open arms – was allowed to become the mayor of one of the greatest cities of the Western World?
Remember, after each Muslim-inspired attack, Mayor Khan said little by way of condemning those attacks. He said far more in telling London citizens to accept those attacks – and the media does not call this out as outrageous?
There is a sickness throughout Europe. It is now infesting Canada and doing all it can to invade the United States.
That sickness comes in the form of political correctness and complicity in the destruction of freedom and security.
Everyone deserves to feel safe and be allowed to live their lives as they choose. Figures like London Mayor Sadiq Khan think differently. Khan’s devotion is found in his radical religious views and not with freedom and liberty.