Prager: Will the Second Civil War Turn Violent?

Truth Revolt

In a recent column, I made the case that Americans are fighting the Second Civil War. The deep chasm that has opened up between the left — not liberals, the left — and the rest of the country is so wide and so unbridgeable that there is no other way to describe what is happening. But I noted that at least thus far, unlike the First Civil War, this war is not violent.

Unfortunately, there is now reason to believe that violence is coming. In fact, it’s already here. But as of now, it’s only coming from one direction.

Left-wing thugs engage in violence and threats of violence with utter impunity. They shut down speakers at colleges; block highways, bridges and airport terminals; take over college buildings and offices; occupy state capitals; and terrorize individuals at their homes.

In order to understand why more violence may be coming, it is essential to understand that left-wing mobs are almost never stopped, arrested or punished. Colleges do nothing to stop them, and civil authorities do nothing to stop them on campuses or anywhere else. Police are reduced to spectators as they watch left-wing gangs loot stores, smash business and car windows, and even take over state capitals (as in Madison, Wisconsin).

It’s beginning to dawn on many Americans that mayors, police chiefs and college presidents have no interest in stopping this violence. Left-wing officials sympathize with the lawbreakers, and the police, who rarely sympathize with thugs of any ideology, are ordered to do nothing by emasculated police chiefs.

Consequently, given the abdication by all these authorities of their role to protect the public, some members of the public will inevitably decide that they will protect themselves and others.

This ability of the left to get away with violence is one of the gravest threats to American society in its modern history. Since the Civil War, I can think of only two comparable eruptions of mob violence that authorities allowed. One was when white mobs lynched blacks. The other was the rioting by blacks, such as the Los Angeles riots 25 years ago, and the recent riots in Ferguson, Missouri, and Baltimore, Maryland.

Today, authorities in what we once proudly proclaimed the “Land of the Free and Home of the Brave” are intimidated to the point of paralysis.

And exactly what do they fear? Not violence — they have made peace with left-wing violence. What they fear is the left-wing media. If the Black Lives Matter movement is forcefully prevented from blocking tens of thousands of cars from entering or leaving San Francisco, the police and local authorities will be labeled racist by black leaders, a smear that will then be echoed by The New York Times and rest of the left-wing media.

Likewise, if a college president requests enough police to come to a college campus so that a Heather Mac Donald, a Charles Murray or an Ann Coulter can deliver a lecture, some of the student-gangsters engaged in violence might be injured — and that college president will then be pilloried by the mainstream media.

Furthermore, left-wing violence doesn’t only succeed where it takes place. It succeeds where nothing happens. The left can now shut down places and events just by threatening violence. This is what happened last week in Portland, Oregon. One leftist called in a threat to the 82nd Avenue of Roses Parade, saying that the Republican Party contingent marching in the parade would be beaten up. The business leaders organizing the parade canceled the whole event for the first time in its 10-year history. If they’d had any reason to believe that the police would have adequately protected the marchers in left-wing Portland, one assumes (hopes?) that they would not have canceled the parade.

An email sent to parade organizers perfectly summed up the left’s dominance of America through violence. It said, “You have seen how much power we have downtown and that the police cannot stop us from shutting down roads so please consider your decision wisely.”

Meanwhile, the press lies about alleged white supremacists in President Trump’s administration and an alleged massive surge in anti-Semitism in order to do what the left has done since Lenin: blame others while it alone organizes violence.

So, here’s a prediction: If college presidents, mayors and police chiefs won’t stop left-wing mobs, other Americans will. I hope this doesn’t happen, because electing conservative Republicans and not donating money to colleges will be more effective. But it is almost inevitable.

Then the left-wing media — the mainstream media — will enter hysteria mode with reports that “right-wing fascists” are violently attacking America.

And that’s when mayors and college presidents will finally order in the police.

2 comments on “Prager: Will the Second Civil War Turn Violent?
  1. Former U.S. Army officer Thomas Chittum’s prescient book on what’s coming up, “Civil War Two”, is looking more and more like current events.

  2. The second Civil War has already turned violent, from coast to coast.

    The riots in Baltimore and Ferguson were the left’s violent demands that justice be subservient to Obama’s lies. From day 1 Obama knew that incidents Cambridge, Florida, Ferguson and Baltimore were not race related but rather reflections of political correctness. Yet he continued to stoke the fires. While he was doing this he was also refusing to recognize black on white violence, the knockout game , mass attacks at public events etc. But all of that rose to a new level during the last election.

    Violent attacks on Trump supporters occurred while police stood by in liberal bastions. In California BAMN ( By All Means Necessary) a marxist organization based in Oakland, sent 300 to Sacramento to attack about 30 folks who were handing out literature on the grounds of the State Capitol pursuant to a permit.

    It was not a confrontation that escalated into violence . The BAMN anarchists stormed into the area , heavily armed with large sticks, and backpacks filled with softball sized rocks simply attacked. The small group was outnumbered something like 10: – 20:1 and not prepared for the confrontation.

    The leader of BAMN was featured on TV during the attacks celebrating their victory and proclaiming that they came to Sacramento to attack these people , they were successful in their attack and that they would attack any group which they opposed including this group. As her arrogance ran her mouth she essentially provided everything a prosecutor needed to put her on trial for 2-4 serious felonies.

    But this was California and the attorney general was a friend along with the governor so there was no prosecution.

    BAMN lead the violence in Berkley, attacking anybody who looked like a conservative with baseball bats , martial arts weapons , firebombs , etc and then kicking them when they were down. A favorite tactic was for one BAMN member to feign an attack from the front while a partner approached unseen with a heavy club or baseball bat, swinging for the head. Other BAMN members used broke windows and firebombed buidings. The University of CA police hid behind doors or in their vehicles claiming they did not want to provoke the attackers.

    The situation repeated itself a few weeks later.

    It turns out that the Mayor of Berkley is a supporter if not member of BAMN

    The situation in California is reaching the tipping point where law abiding citizens will have determined that the state and local government is no longer performing its basic function of providing for the public safety .

Comments are closed.