Economist magazine claims: “The future of the liberal world order depends on whether she [Hillary Clinton] succeeds,” while blaming patriots and anti-globalists for causing crises across the globe.
During the 2014 riots in Ferguson, Missouri Old-Thinker News reported that “The establishment is attempting to direct the spirit of the nation into a destructive revolution of bloody conflagration and hate that will only result in more power for the elite. If the nation is allowed to unify over issues of sound economic policy, purging government corruption, and re-affirming our moral code as a nation and as individuals, the corrupt elite will be brought to justice. As long as the country is divided this cannot happen.”
In the two years after Ferguson, the establishment has attempted to divide the nation even further along racial, sexual identity and “social justice” issues.
The real issue of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election is the divide between globalism and nationalism; Globalists Vs. anti-globalists. It is the same issue facing millions across the globe as the United Kingdom recently voted to exit the European Union. The elite have known that resistance to their plans for the world is building to a critical mass. It is for this reason that deliberate attempts are being made to divert this energy into divisive issues, causing a destructive revolution that will give more power to the elite.
Make no mistake; as the world becomes more chaotic, establishment propaganda will blame nationalists, patriot groups, Trump supporters and others for causing it. The Economist magazinerecently blamed anti-globalists for the rising crises engulfing the EU. The article concludes by stating that “The future of the liberal world order depends on whether she [Hillary Clinton] succeeds.”
Council on Foreign Relations member James Traub called for elites to rise up against nationalists who are an example of how “extremism has gone mainstream”. Paul Joseph Watson writes,
“Traub’s tone is so contemptuous, he even describes the pro-Trump Republican base as “know nothing” voters and sneers at voters in Poland for being concerned about “values and tradition,” while stressing that the push for further globalization will pit “poor and non-white and marginal citizens” against “working-class and middle-class whites,” whom he describes as angry “fist-shakers”.”
In reality, globalist policies have created or exacerbated the crises we are now witnessing.
Globalists have had a long term plan for breaking down borders and deliberately creating societal chaos. The Rockefeller foundation spearheaded globalist initiatives for decades in America, but George Soros’ foundations are now leading the way. Illegal immigration is being used as a battering ram to complete these objectives, a problem which is largely driven by globalist backed wars and policies of international bankers.
Long term plans come to fruition
Hacked documents from George Soros’ Open Society Foundation demonstrate the deliberate effort to use illegal immigration as a tool of forced globalization. The report states that the immigration crisis presents an opportunity to expand the organizations operations and influence nation’s policies. The report says, “As our aspirations have evolved, our targets have shifted from harm reduction to more proactive solutions-based policy influencing.”
The document continues, “The current climate presents new opportunities for reforming migration governance at the global level, whether through the existing multi-lateral system, or by bringing together a range of actors to think more innovatively.”
While George Soros is presently leading globalist initiatives, plans for using illegal immigration to further globalization go back decades, and emanate from multiple foundations.
A 2010 report from the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defense stated that by 2040 a “global society” will emerge, plagued with tensions brought about by globalization. The report says that “sustained international migration” will “drive the development of a global culture…” Because of the increased migration, tensions will inevitably emerge. “Intrusive global culture” will threaten traditional customs and beliefs and “possibly radicalize” certain groups.
The document also seems to describe groups like George Soros’ Open Society Foundation by “predicting” “…the emergence of a global elite, a powerful network of individuals and institutions that sits above the level of individual states and influences the global agenda.”
On June 11, 2002 a conference on North American integration was held by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. The center, which influences policy making in Washington, is funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, The Gates Foundation and George Soros. During the 2002 meeting, shocking revelations were made regarding the elite’s plans to create a North American Union between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. In order to accomplish this, representatives from various think tanks agreed that a campaign of social engineering needed to re-shape beliefs about national sovereignty and identity.
Bruce Stokes, Council on Foreign Relations Senior Fellow, National Journal columnist and Chatham House member told the conference that a true “North American Community” would only be “…forged in the heat of conflict, not through a rational discussion, as painful as that may be. It really cannot happen any other way.”
As early as the 1970′s, the World Order Models Project, financed by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Rockefeller foundation, proposed “strategies of transition” into a new global era. Saul H. Mendlovitz, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, directed the project. Richard A. Falk, also a member of the CFR, contributed academic work.
The goals of the WOMP were to, “…go beyond the nation-state system…to use a much broader range of potential actors, including world institutions, transnational actors, international organization, functional activities, regional arrangements…”
The project sought to use world leaders like the Pope to promote the globalists agenda. Richard Falk wrote,
“Symbolic world leaders such as the Secretary General of the United Nations or the Pope might espouse [the WOMP agenda]… as a program for the future… These kinds of external developments… would initiate a world order dialectic within American politics that would begin to break down decades of adherence to [the Westphalian system] and its infrastructure of values, perceptions and institutions.”
Pope Francis recently called for a “New humanity” to embrace a globalist ideology that “refuses to see borders as barriers.”
The establishment is sowing seeds of discord across the world and presenting solutions that work in its favor. In response, we need to continue pointing out the man behind the curtain, rather than falling into divisive traps. Hillary Clinton’s failing health is a timely representation of the failing establishment. Political science professor Helmut Norpoth is predicting that Donald Trump has an 87% chance of winning the 2016 election.